Paper detail

Spectral line asymmetries in the metal-poor red giant HD 122563: CO5BOLD predictions versus observations

We study the influence of convection on the asymmetries and Doppler shifts of Fe I spectral lines in the metal-poor red giant HD 122563. To this end, we compute theoretical Fe I line shifts and line bisectors using 3D hydrodynamical model atmosphere of HD 122563 calculated with the CO5BOLD code. We then make a detailed comparison of the theoretical line shifts and bisectors with those derived from the high quality HARPS spectrum of HD 122563 taken from the ESO Science Archive Facility (R = 115 000, average signal-to-noise ratio, S/N = 310). In general, we find a good agreement between the theoretically predicted and observed Doppler shifts of Fe I line cores, with somewhat larger discrepancies seen in the case of weaker (equivalent width W < 5 pm) and stronger lines (W > 11 pm). Both observed and theoretical coreshifts cover a range between 0 and -1 km/s, with increasingly stronger blueshifts for weaker lines and slight hints of a coreshift dependence on wavelength. Theoretical bisectors reproduce the observed ones reasonably well too, however, theoretical bisectors of the weak red (lambda > 600 nm) Fe I lines have blueshifts that are by up to 200 m/s larger than observed. The obtained results therefore suggest that the current CO5BOLD models are capable of reproducing the large-scale velocity fields in the atmosphere of HD 122563 suficiently well. Nevertheless, further efforts are needed in order to understand the physical reasons behind the discrepancies in theoretical predictions and observed properties of the weakest and strongest Fe I lines.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.