Paper detail

Spectral large deviations of sparse random matrices

Eigenvalues of Wigner matrices has been a major topic of investigation. A particularly important subclass of such random matrices is formed by the adjacency matrix of an Erdős-Rényi graph $\mathcal{G}_{n,p}$ equipped with i.i.d. edge-weights. An observable of particular interest is the largest eigenvalue. In this paper, we study the large deviations behavior of the largest eigenvalue of such matrices, a topic that has received considerable attention over the years. We focus on the case $p = \frac{d}{n}$, where most known techniques break down. So far, results were known only for $\mathcal{G}_{n,\frac{d}{n}}$ without edge-weights (Krivelevich and Sudakov, &#39;03), (Bhattacharya, Bhattacharya, and Ganguly, &#39;21) and with Gaussian edge-weights (Ganguly and Nam, &#39;21). In the present article, we consider the effect of general weight distributions. More specifically, we consider the entries whose tail probabilities decay at rate $e^{-t^α}$ with $α>0$, where the regimes $0<α<2$ and $α>2$ correspond to tails heavier and lighter than the Gaussian tail respectively. While in many natural settings the large deviations behavior is expected to depend crucially on the entry distribution, we establish a surprising and rare universal behavior showing that this is not the case when $α> 2.$ In contrast, in the $α< 2$ case, the large deviation rate function is no longer universal and is given by the solution to a variational problem, the description of which involves a generalization of the Motzkin-Straus theorem, a classical result from spectral graph theory. As a byproduct of our large deviation results, we also establish new law of large numbers results for the largest eigenvalue. In particular, we show that the typical value of the largest eigenvalue exhibits a phase transition at $α= 2$, i.e. the Gaussian distribution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.