Paper detail

Spectral index distribution over radio lobes of 4C 14.11 using astrophysical data in FITS format

The goal of this paper is to investigate the flux and spectral index distribution of FR II radio galaxy 4C 14.11. We focused on the distribution of flux and spectral indices over the lobes, as well as in their hot spots. For that purpose, we used publicly available observations of this radio galaxy given at 1450 and 8440 MHz. Particularly, we used Leahy's Atlas of radio-emitting double radio sources, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics in Manchester, as well as NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database. We found that the non-thermal (synchrotron) radiation dominates over the areas of the lobes. Distinction between hot spots and rest of the lobes are much smaller in the spectral index than in the flux. We also found that over the inner parts of both lobes, spectral index $α$ is flat in average and significantly higher than 1.2, indicating that 4C 14.11 is old AGN.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.