Paper detail

Spectral Evolution of NGC 1313 X-2: Evidence Against The Cool Disk Model

The presence of a cool multicolor disk component with an inner disk temperature kT=0.1~0.3 keV at a luminosity L>10^40 erg/s has been interpreted as evidence that the ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 1313 X-2 harbors an intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH). The temperature of a disk component should vary with luminosity as $L\propto T^4$. However, upon investigating the spectral evolution with multiple XMM-Newton observations, we found that the cool disk component failed to follow this relation with a confidence level of 0.999964. Indeed, the luminosity decreases as the temperature increases, and the luminosities at high temperatures are more than an order of magnitude less than expected from the $L\propto T^4$ extrapolation of luminosities at low temperatures. This places a strong constraint against the validity of modeling the X-ray spectra of NGC 1313 X-2 as emission from the accretion disk of an IMBH. The decrease in luminosity with increasing temperature of the soft component follows the trend suggested by a model in which the soft emission arises from an outflow from a stellar-mass black hole with super-Eddington accretion viewed along the symmetry axis. Alternatively, the spectra can be adequately fitted by a p-free disk model with kT=~2 keV and p=~0.5. The spectral evolution is consistent with the $L\propto T^4$ relation and appears to be a high luminosity extension of the L-kT relation of Galactic black holes. This, again, would suggest that the emission is from a super-Eddington accreting stellar mass black hole.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.