Paper detail

Spectral Edge in Sparse Random Graphs: Upper and Lower Tail Large Deviations

In this paper we consider the problem of estimating the joint upper and lower tail large deviations of the edge eigenvalues of an Erdős-Rényi random graph $\mathcal{G}_{n,p}$, in the regime of $p$ where the edge of the spectrum is no longer governed by global observables, such as the number of edges, but rather by localized statistics, such as high degree vertices. Going beyond the recent developments in mean-field approximations of related problems, this paper provides a comprehensive treatment of the large deviations of the spectral edge in this entire regime, which notably includes the well studied case of constant average degree. In particular, for $r \geq 1$ fixed, we pin down the asymptotic probability that the top $r$ eigenvalues are jointly greater/less than their typical values by multiplicative factors bigger/smaller than $1$, in the regime mentioned above. The proof for the upper tail relies on a novel structure theorem, obtained by building on estimates of Krivelevich and Sudakov (2003), followed by an iterative cycle removal process, which shows, conditional on the upper tail large deviation event, with high probability the graph admits a decomposition in to a disjoint union of stars and a spectrally negligible part. On the other hand, the key ingredient in the proof of the lower tail is a Ramsey-type result which shows that if the $K$-th largest degree of a graph is not atypically small (for some large $K$ depending on $r$), then either the top eigenvalue or the $r$-th largest eigenvalue is larger than that allowed by the lower tail event on the top $r$ eigenvalues, thus forcing a contradiction. The above arguments reduce the problems to developing a large deviation theory for the extremal degrees which could be of independent interest.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.