Paper detail

Spectral density of products of Wishart dilute random matrices. Part I: the dense case

In this work we study the spectral density of products of Wishart diluted random matrices of the form $X(1)\cdots X(M)(X(1)\cdots X(M))^T$ using the Edwards-Jones trick to map this problem into a system of interacting particles with random couplings on a multipartite graph. We apply the cavity method to obtain recursive relations in typical instances from which to obtain the spectral density. As this problem is fairly rich, we start by reporting in part I a lengthy analysis for the case of dense matrices. Here we derive that the spectral density is a solution of a polynomial equation of degree $M+1$ and obtain exact expressions of it for $M=1$, $2$ and $3$. For general $M$, we are able to find the exact expression of the spectral density only when all the matrices $X(t)$ for $t=1,\ldots, M$ are square. We also make some observations for general $M$, based admittedly on some weak numerical evidence, which we expect to be correct.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.