Paper detail

Spectral Clustering in Birthday Paradox Time

Given a vertex in a $(k, φ, ε)$-clusterable graph, i.e. a graph whose vertex set can be partitioned into a disjoint union of $φ$-expanders of size $\approx n/k$ with outer conductance bounded by $ε$, can one quickly tell which cluster it belongs to? This question goes back to the expansion testing problem of Goldreich and Ron'11. For $k=2$ a sample of $\approx n^{1/2+O(ε/φ^2)}$ logarithmic length walks from a given vertex approximately determines its cluster membership by the birthday paradox: two vertices whose random walk samples are `close' are likely in the same cluster. The study of the general case $k>2$ was initiated by Czumaj, Peng and Sohler [STOC'15], and the works of Chiplunkar et al. [FOCS'18], Gluch et al. [SODA'21] showed that $\approx \text{poly}(k)\cdot n^{1/2+O(ε/φ^2)}$ random walk samples suffice for general $k$. This matches the $k=2$ result up to polynomial factors in $k$, but creates a conceptual inconsistency: if the birthday paradox is the guiding phenomenon, then the query complexity should decrease with the number of clusters $k$! Since clusters have size $\approx n/k$, we expect to need $\approx (n/k)^{1/2+O(ε/φ^2)}$ random walk samples, which decreases with $k$. We design a novel representation of vertices in a $(k, φ, ε)$-clusterable graph by a mixture of logarithmic length walks. This representation uses the optimal $\approx (n/k)^{1/2+O(ε/φ^2)}$ walks per vertex, and allows for a fast nearest neighbor search: given $k$ vertices representing the clusters, we can find the cluster of a given query vertex $x$ using nearly linear time in the representation size of $x$. This gives a clustering oracle with query time $\approx (n/k)^{1/2+O(ε/φ^2)}$ and space complexity $k\cdot (n/k)^{1/2+O(ε/φ^2)}$, matching the birthday paradox bound.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.