Paper detail

Spectral analysis of 636 white dwarf - M star binaries from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

We present a catalog of 857 white dwarf (WD)-M binaries from the sixth data release (DR6) of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), most of which were previously identified. For 636 of them, we complete a spectral analysis and derive the basic parameters of their stellar constituents and their distances from Earth. We attempt to measure fundamental parameters of these systems by completing spectral analyses. We use a Chi^2 minimization technique to decompose each combined spectrum and derive independent parameter estimates for its components. Forty-one of the stellar duets in our spectroscopic sample are optically resolved in their respective SDSS images. For these systems, we also derive a minimum true spatial separation and a lower limit to their orbital periods, typically which are some 10^4 yr. Spectra of 167 stellar duets show significant hydrogen emission and in most cases no additional He i or He ii features. We also find that 20 of the 636 WDs are fitted to be DOs, with 16 measured to have T_eff around 40,000 K. Furthermore, we identify 70 very low-mass objects, which are secondaries of masses smaller than about 0.1 solar masses, to be candidate substellar companions. Although various selection effects may play a role, the fraction 6.4 % of WD-M star binaries with orbital separations of around 500 AU is a criterion for evolutionary models of stellar binary systems. Active M dwarfs are likely present in 155 Balmer-emitting systems, corresponding to a fraction of 24.4 %. The excess of cool DOs is most likely due to additional WDs in the DB-DO T_eff range, for which no detailed fitting was completed. The trend of the M stars being closer to Earth than the WD component is probably due to an underestimation of the theoretical M star radii.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.