Paper detail

Spectra of strong MHD Turbulence from high-resolution simulations

Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence is a ubiquitous phenomenon in solar physics, plasma physics and astrophysics and governs many properties of the flows of well-conductive fluids. Recently, conflicting spectral slopes for the inertial range of MHD turbulence has been reported by different groups. Varying spectral shapes from earlier simulations hinted at a wider spectral locality of MHD, which necessitated higher resolution simulations and careful and rigorous numerical analysis. In this Letter we present two groups of simulations with resolution up to 4096^3 that are numerically well-resolved and has been analyzed with exact and well-tested method of scaling study. Our results from both simulation groups indicate that the power spectral slope for all energy-related quantities, such as total energy and residual energy are around -1.7, close to Kolmogorov's -5/3. This suggests that residual energy is the constant fraction, 0.15+-0.03 of the total energy and that in asymptotic regime magnetic and kinetic spectra have the same scaling. The -1.5 slope for energy and -2 slope for residual energy suggested by other groups seems to be completely inconsistent with numerics.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.