Paper detail

Specifying the Environments around GRB, Explaining the Fe line in the X-Ray Afterglow of GRB000214

We present a model explaining the Fe K alpha line and the continuum in the afterglow of GRB000214. We pose the importance to seek the physically natural environment around GRB000214. For the reproduction of the observation, we need the ring-like remnant around the progenitor like that of SN 1987A produced by the mass-loss of the progenitor and the fireball spread over in every directions. The observation of GRB000214, in which the continuum power law spectrum decreased faster than the line, motivated us to consider the two independent systems for the line emission and the continuum spectrum. At first, the continuum spectrum can be fitted by the afterglow emission of the fireball pointing toward the observer which does not collide with the ring because the emission of GRB and the afterglow are highly collimated to the observer by the relativistic beaming effect. Secondly, the line can be fitted by the fluorescence of the Fe atoms in the ring illuminated by the X-ray afterglow. The significance of this study is that our model may constrain strongly the GRB model. Although the Supranova model assumes the extreme-ring-like remnant produced by the usual supernova explosion, this may not be probable. It is because the supernova remnants are known to be shell-like. The model also assumes two steps of explosions, on the other hand, we need only one explosion of the progenitor. In this sense, our scenario is more natural. Moreover, in the numerical simulations of Hypernova, the jet of the opening angle of only 1 degree is generated. In our model, the fireball which spreads over in every directions reconciles with the observation of 1 percent of the polarization in the observation of SN1998bw which showed the explosion might not be so collimated.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.