Paper detail

Spatio-temporal analysis of chromospheric heating in a plage region

Our knowledge of the heating mechanisms that are at work in the chromosphere of plage regions remains highly unconstrained from observational studies. The purpose of our study is to estimate the chromospheric heating terms from a plage dataset, characterize their spatio-temporal distribution and set constraints on the heating processes that are at work. We make use of NLTE inversions to infer a model of the photosphere and chromosphere of a plage dataset acquired with the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope. We use this model atmosphere to calculate the chromospheric radiative losses from H i, Ca ii and Mg ii atoms. We approximate the chromospheric heating terms by the net radiative losses predicted by the inverted model. In order to make the analysis of time-series over a large field-of-view computationally tractable, we make use of a neural network. In the lower chromosphere, the contribution from the Ca ii lines is dominant and located in the surroundings of the photospheric footpoints. In the upper chromosphere, the H i contribution is dominant. Radiative losses in the upper chromosphere form an homogeneous patch that covers the plage region. The net radiative losses can be split in a periodic component with an average amplitude of ampQ = 7.6 kW m^{-2} and a static (or very slowly evolving) component with a mean value of -26.1 kW m^{-2}. Our interpretation is that in the lower chromosphere, the radiative losses are tracing the sharp lower edge of the hot magnetic canopy, where the electric current is expected to be large. In the upper chromosphere, both the magnetic field and the distribution of net radiative losses are room-filling, whereas the amplitude of the periodic component is largest. Our results suggest that acoustic wave heating may be responsible for one third of the energy deposition in the upper chromosphere, whereas other heating mechanisms must be responsible for the rest.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.