Paper detail

Spatially resolved stellar population parameters in the BCGs of two fossil groups

We report the results of Gemini/GMOS long-slit spectroscopic observations along the major and minor axes of the central galaxies in two fossil groups, SDSS J073422.21+265133.9 and SDSS J075828.11+374711.8 (the NGC 2484 group). Spatially resolved kinematics and stellar population parameters (ages, metallicities and $α$-element abundance ratios) derived using ~20 Lick indices are presented. Despite remarkable similarities in their morphologies, photometric properties (luminosity and colour) and kinematics, the two galaxies exhibit significantly different stellar population parameters. SDSS J073422.21+265133.9 exhibits a strong metallicity gradient (Delta[Z/H]/Delta R ~ -0.4) all the way into the centre of the galaxy. It also exhibits an age profile that suggest a relatively recent, centrally concentrated burst of star formation superimposed on an older, more spatially extended population. NGC 2484, a well known X-ray AGN, exhibits a flat core-like structure in its metallicity gradient, but no detectable age gradient. The alpha-element abundance ratio ([E/Fe]) profiles of the two galaxies are also significantly different. SDSS J073422.21+265133.9 exhibits a slightly positive gradient (Delta [E/H]/Delta R ~ 0.1), perhaps again suggesting a more recent central burst of star formation, while NGC 2484 shows a negative gradient (Delta [E/H]/Delta R ~-0.1), indicating that star formation may have happened "inside out". Our analysis of these two galaxies of similar mass, morphology and kinematics therefore suggests two different mechanisms to have been in action during their formation. Consequently, we conclude that the central galaxies of fossil groups can not be considered a homogeneous group with regard to their formation processes or star formation histories.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.