Paper detail

Spatially Resolved Modeling of Optical Albedos for a Sample of Six Hot Jupiters

Optical secondary eclipse measurements made by \emph{Kepler} reveal a diverse set of geometric albedos for hot Jupiters with equilibrium temperatures between $1550-1700$ K. The presence or absence of high altitude condensates, such as Mg$_2$SiO$_4$, Fe, Al$_2$O$_3$, and TiO$_2$, can significantly alter optical albedos, but these clouds are expected to be confined to localized regions in the atmospheres of these tidally locked planets. Here, we present 3D general circulation models and corresponding cloud and albedo maps for six hot Jupiters with measured optical albedos in this temperature range. We find that the observed optical albedos of K2-31b and K2-107b are best matched by either cloud free models or models with relatively compact cloud layers, while Kepler-8b and Kepler-17b's optical albedos can be matched by moderately extended ($f_{sed}$ = 0.1) parametric cloud models. HATS-11b has a high optical albedo, corresponding to models with bright Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ clouds extending to very low pressures ($f_{sed}$ = 0.03). We are unable to reproduce Kepler-7b's high albedo, as our models predict that the dayside will be dominated by dark Al$_2$O$_3$ clouds at most longitudes. We compare our parametric cloud model with a two-zone microphysical cloud model (\texttt{CARMA}). We find that even after accounting for the 3D thermal structure, no single cloud model can explain the full range of observed albedos within the sample. We conclude that a better knowledge of the vertical mixing profiles, cloud radiative feedback, cloud condensate properties, and atmospheric metallicities is needed in order to explain the unexpected diversity of albedos in this temperature range.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.