Paper detail

Spatially adaptive, Bayesian estimation for probabilistic temperature forecasts

Uncertainty in the prediction of future weather is commonly assessed through the use of forecast ensembles that employ a numerical weather prediction model in distinct variants. Statistical postprocessing can correct for biases in the numerical model and improves calibration. We propose a Bayesian version of the standard ensemble model output statistics (EMOS) postprocessing method, in which spatially varying bias coefficients are interpreted as realizations of Gaussian Markov random fields. Our Markovian EMOS (MEMOS) technique utilizes the recently developed stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) and integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) methods for computationally efficient inference. The MEMOS approach shows good predictive performance in a comparative study of 24-hour ahead temperature forecasts over Germany based on the 50-member ensemble of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.