Paper detail

Spatial response identification enables robust experimental ultrasound computed tomography

Ultrasound computed tomography techniques have the potential to provide clinicians with 3D, quantitative and high-resolution information of both soft and hard tissues such as the breast or the adult human brain. Their practical application requires accurate modelling of the acquisition setup: the spatial location, orientation, and impulse response of each ultrasound transducer. However, existing calibration methods fail to accurately characterise these transducers unless their size can be considered negligible when compared to the dominant wavelength, which reduces signal-to-noise ratios below usable levels in the presence of high-contrast tissues such as the skull. In this paper, we introduce a methodology that can simultaneously estimate the location, orientation, and impulse response of the ultrasound transducers in a single calibration. We do this by extending spatial response identification, an algorithm that we have recently proposed to estimate transducer impulse responses. Our proposed methodology replaces the transducers in the acquisition device with a surrogate model whose effective response matches the experimental data by fitting a numerical model of wave propagation. This results in a flexible and robust calibration procedure that can accurately predict the behaviour of the ultrasound acquisition device without ever having to know where the real transducers are or their individual impulse response. Experimental results using a ring acquisition system show that spatial response identification produces calibrations of significantly higher quality than standard methodologies across all transducers, both in transmission and in reception. Experimental full-waveform inversion reconstructions of a tissue-mimicking phantom demonstrate that spatial response identification generates more accurate reconstructions than those produced with standard calibration techniques.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.