Paper detail

Spatial populations with seed-bank: well-posedness, duality and equilibrium

We consider a system of interacting Fisher-Wright diffusions with seed-bank. Individuals live in colonies and are subject to resampling and migration as long as they are active. Each colony has a structured seed-bank into which individuals can retreat to become dormant, suspending their resampling and migration until they become active again. As geographic space labelling the colonies we consider a countable Abelian group $\mathbb{G}$ endowed with the discrete topology. The key example of interest is the Euclidean lattice $\mathbb{G}=\mathbb{Z}^d$. Our goal is to classify the long-time behaviour of the system in terms of the underlying model parameters. In particular, we want to understand in what way the seed-bank enhances genetic diversity. We introduce three models of increasing generality, namely, individuals become dormant: (1) in the seed-bank of their colony; (2) in the seed-bank of their colony while adopting a random colour that determines their wake-up time; (3) in the seed-bank of a random colony while adopting a random colour. The extension in (2) allows us to model wake-up times with fat tails while preserving the Markov property of the evolution. For each of the three models we show that the system converges to a unique equilibrium depending on a single density parameter that is determined by the initial state, and exhibits a dichotomy of coexistence (= locally multi-type equilibrium) versus clustering (= locally mono-type equilibrium) depending on the parameters controlling the migration and the seed-bank. The dichotomy between clustering and coexistence in model 1 is determined by migration only. In models (2) and (3), when the wake-up time has infinite mean, the dichotomy is determined by both the exchange with the seed-bank and migration. It turns out that the seed-bank affects the long-time behaviour both quantitatively and qualitatively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.