Paper detail

Spatial distribution and interpretation of the 3.3 \mum PAH emission band of the Red Rectangle

The spatial distribution of 3.3 \mum PAH and associated emission in the 3.3" x 6.0" inner region of the Red Rectangle nebula has been determined using the UIST imager-spectrometer at the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT). Interpretation of the 3.3 \mum feature as comprising two spectroscopic components centred at 3.30 \mum and 3.28 \mum, as put forward by Song et al. (2003, 2007), is supported by these data which reveal that they have different spatial distributions. It is deduced that there are two classes of 3.3 \mum band carrier with a peak wavelength separation of ~0.02 \mum. From comparison of the 3.3 \mum observations with laboratory and theoretical spectra for a range of PAH molecules it is proposed that the 3.28 \mum and 3.30 \mum components arise from 'bay' and 'non-bay' hydrogen sites, respectively, on the periphery of small neutral PAHs. Observational data are also obtained for L-band continuum emission and for the Pfund εhydrogen recombination line.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.