Paper detail

Spatial Clustering of High Redshift Lyman Break Galaxies

We present a physically motivated semi-analytic model to understand the clustering of high redshift LBGs. We show that the model parameters constrained by the observed luminosity function, can be used to predict large scale (θ> 80 arcsec) bias and angular correlation function of galaxies. These predictions are shown to reproduce the observations remarkably well. We then adopt these model parameters to calculate the halo occupation distribution (HOD) using the conditional mass function. The halo model using this HOD is shown to provide a reasonably good fit to the observed clustering of LBGs at both large (θ>80") and small (θ< 10") angular scales for z=3-5 and several limiting magnitudes. However, our models underpredict the clustering amplitude at intermediate angular scales, where quasi-linear effects are important. The average mass of halos contributing to the observed clustering is found to be 6.2 x 10^{11} M_\odot and the characteristic mass of a parent halo hosting satellite galaxies is 1.2 \times 10^{12} M_\odot for a limiting absolute magnitude of -20.5 at z=4. For a given threshold luminosity these masses decrease with increasing z and at any given z these are found to increase with increasing value of threshold luminosity. We find that approximately 40 % of the halos above a minimum mass M_{min}, can host detectable central galaxies and about 5-10 % of these halos are likely to also host a detectable satellite. The satellites form typically a dynamical timescale prior to the formation of the parent halo. The small angular scale clustering is due to central-satellite pairs and is quite sensitive to changes in the duration of star formation in a halo. The present data favor star formation in a halo lasting typically for a few dynamical time-scales. Our models also reproduce different known trends between parameters related to star formation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.