Paper detail

Sparsity Based Non-Contact Vital Signs Monitoring of Multiple People Via FMCW Radar

Non-contact technology for monitoring multiple people's vital signs, such as respiration and heartbeat, has been investigated in recent years due to the rising cardiopulmonary morbidity, the risk of transmitting diseases, and the heavy burden on the medical staff. Frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radars have shown great promise in meeting these needs. However, contemporary techniques for non-contact vital signs monitoring (NCVSM) via FMCW radars, are based on simplistic models, and present difficulties coping with noisy environments containing multiple objects. In this work, we develop an extended model of FMCW radar signals in a noisy setting containing multiple people and clutter. By utilizing the sparse nature of the modeled signals in conjunction with human-typical cardiopulmonary features, we can accurately localize humans and reliably monitor their vital signs, using only a single channel and a single-input-single-output setup. To this end, we first show that spatial sparsity allows for both accurate detection of multiple people and computationally efficient extraction of their Doppler samples, using a joint sparse recovery approach. Given the extracted samples, we develop a method named Vital Signs based Dictionary Recovery (VSDR), which uses a dictionary-based approach to search for the desired rates of respiration and heartbeat over high-resolution grids corresponding to normal cardiopulmonary activity. The advantages of the proposed method are illustrated through examples that combine the proposed model with real data of $30$ monitored individuals. We demonstrate accurate human localization in a clutter-rich scenario that includes both static and vibrating objects, and show that our VSDR approach outperforms existing techniques, based on several statistical metrics. The findings support the widespread use of FMCW radars with the proposed algorithms in healthcare.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.