Paper detail

Sparse source travel-time tomography of a laboratory target: accuracy and robustness of anomaly detection

This study concerned conebeam travel-time tomography. The focus was on a sparse distribution of signal sources that can be necessary in a challenging in situ environment such as in asteroid tomography. The goal was to approximate the minimum number of source positions needed for robust detection of refractive anomalies, e.g., voids within an asteroid or a casting defects in concrete. Experimental ultrasonic data were recorded utilizing as a target a 150 mm plastic cast cube containing three stones with diameter between 22 and 41 mm. A signal frequency of 55 kHz (35 mm wavelength) was used. Source counts from one to six were tested for different placements. Based on our statistical inversion approach and analysis of the results, three or four sources were found to lead to reliable inversion. The source configurations investigated were also ranked according to their performance. Our results can be used, for example, in the planning of planetary missions as well as in material testing.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.