Paper detail

Sparse Regularization: Convergence Of Iterative Jumping Thresholding Algorithm

In recent studies on sparse modeling, non-convex penalties have received considerable attentions due to their superiorities on sparsity-inducing over the convex counterparts. Compared with the convex optimization approaches, however, the non-convex approaches have more challenging convergence analysis. In this paper, we study the convergence of a non-convex iterative thresholding algorithm for solving sparse recovery problems with a certain class of non-convex penalties, whose corresponding thresholding functions are discontinuous with jump discontinuities. Therefore, we call the algorithm the iterative jumping thresholding (IJT) algorithm. The finite support and sign convergence of IJT algorithm is firstly verified via taking advantage of such jump discontinuity. Together with the assumption of the introduced restricted Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz (rKL) property, then the strong convergence of IJT algorithm can be proved.Furthermore, we can show that IJT algorithm converges to a local minimizer at an asymptotically linear rate under some additional conditions. Moreover, we derive a posteriori computable error estimate, which can be used to design practical terminal rules for the algorithm. It should be pointed out that the $l_q$ quasi-norm ($0<q<1$) is an important subclass of the class of non-convex penalties studied in this paper. In particular, when applied to the $l_q$ regularization, IJT algorithm can converge to a local minimizer with an asymptotically linear rate under certain concentration conditions. We provide also a set of simulations to support the correctness of theoretical assertions and compare the time efficiency of IJT algorithm for the $l_{q}$ regularization ($q=1/2, 2/3$) with other known typical algorithms like the iterative reweighted least squares (IRLS) algorithm and the iterative reweighted $l_{1}$ minimization (IRL1) algorithm.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.