Sparse Point-wise Privacy Leakage: Mechanism Design and Fundamental Limits

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study an information-theoretic privacy mechanism design problem, where an agent observes useful data YY that is arbitrarily correlated with sensitive data XX, and design disclosed data UU generated from YY (the agent has no direct access to XX). We introduce \emph{sparse point-wise privacy leakage}, a worst-case privacy criterion that enforces two simultaneous constraints for every disclosed symbol u∈Uu\in\mathcal{U}: (i) uu may be correlated with at most NN realizations of XX, and (ii) the total leakage toward those realizations is bounded. In the high-privacy regime, we use concepts from information geometry to obtain a local quadratic approximation of mutual information which measures utility between UU and YY. When the leakage matrix PX∣YP_{X|Y} is invertible, this approximation reduces the design problem to a sparse quadratic maximization, known as the Rayleigh-quotient problem, with an ℓ0\ell_0 constraint. We further show that, for the approximated problem, one can without loss of optimality restrict attention to a binary released variable UU with a uniform distribution. For small alphabet sizes, the exact sparsity-constrained optimum can be computed via combinatorial support enumeration, which quickly becomes intractable as the dimension grows. For general dimensions, the resulting sparse Rayleigh-quotient maximization is NP-hard and closely related to sparse principal component analysis (PCA). We propose a convex semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation that is solvable in polynomial time and provides a tractable surrogate for the NP-hard design, together with a simple rounding procedure to recover a feasible leakage direction. We also identify a sparsity threshold beyond which the sparse optimum saturates at the unconstrained spectral value and the SDP relaxation becomes tight.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.