Paper detail

Sparse graphs: metrics and random models

Recently, Bollobás, Janson and Riordan introduced a family of random graph models producing inhomogeneous graphs with $n$ vertices and $Θ(n)$ edges whose distribution is characterized by a kernel, i.e., a symmetric measurable function $\ka:[0,1]^2 \to [0,\infty)$. To understand these models, we should like to know when different kernels $\ka$ give rise to `similar' graphs, and, given a real-world network, how `similar' is it to a typical graph $G(n,\ka)$ derived from a given kernel $\ka$. The analogous questions for dense graphs, with $Θ(n^2)$ edges, are answered by recent results of Borgs, Chayes, Lovász, Sós, Szegedy and Vesztergombi, who showed that several natural metrics on graphs are equivalent, and moreover that any sequence of graphs converges in each metric to a graphon, i.e., a kernel taking values in $[0,1]$. Possible generalizations of these results to graphs with $o(n^2)$ but $ω(n)$ edges are discussed in a companion paper [arXiv:0708.1919]; here we focus only on graphs with $Θ(n)$ edges, which turn out to be much harder to handle. Many new phenomena occur, and there are a host of plausible metrics to consider; many of these metrics suggest new random graph models, and vice versa.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.