Paper detail

Sparse Approximation is Hard

Given a redundant dictionary $Φ$, represented by an $M \times N$ matrix ($Φ\in \mathbb{R}^{M \times N}$) and a target signal $y \in \mathbb{R}^M$, the \emph{sparse approximation problem} asks to find an approximate representation of $y$ using a linear combination of at most $k$ atoms. In this paper, a new complexity theoretic hardness result for sparse approximation problem is presented via considering a different measure of quality for the solution. It is argued that, from an algorithmic standpoint, the problem is more meaningful if it asks to maximize the norm of the target signal's projection onto the selected atoms which are represented by column vectors. Then, a multiplicative inapproximability result is established with this new measure, under a reasonable complexity theoretic assumption. This result in turn implies additive inapproximability for the problem with the standard measure. Specifically, if $ZPP \neq NP$, all polynomial time algorithms which provide a $k$-sparse vector $x$ should satisfy $$ {\|y-Φx\|}_2^2 \geq (1-c){\|y-Φx^*\|}_2^2 + c {\|y\|}_2^2, $$ \noindent for $1/4(1-1/e) > c \geq 0$ where $x^*$ is the optimal $k$-sparse solution. This result provides a quantification of the hardness for the case $y-Φx^* = 0$, revealing more details about the inherent structure of the problem.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.