Paper detail

Sparse Adversarial Attack in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (cMARL) has many real applications, but the policy trained by existing cMARL algorithms is not robust enough when deployed. There exist also many methods about adversarial attacks on the RL system, which implies that the RL system can suffer from adversarial attacks, but most of them focused on single agent RL. In this paper, we propose a \textit{sparse adversarial attack} on cMARL systems. We use (MA)RL with regularization to train the attack policy. Our experiments show that the policy trained by the current cMARL algorithm can obtain poor performance when only one or a few agents in the team (e.g., 1 of 8 or 5 of 25) were attacked at a few timesteps (e.g., attack 3 of total 40 timesteps).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.