Paper detail

SpArcFiRe: morphological selection effects due to reduced visibility of tightly winding arms in distant spiral galaxies

The Galaxy Zoo has provided morphological data on many galaxies. Several biases have been identified in the Galaxy Zoo data. Here we report on a newly discovered selection effect: astronomers interested in studying spiral galaxies may select a set of spiral galaxies based upon a threshold in spirality (the fraction of Galaxy Zoo humans who report seeing spiral structure). SpArcFiRe is an automated tool that decomposes a spiral galaxy into its constituent spiral arms, providing objective, quantitative data on their structure. SpArcFiRe measures the pitch angle of spiral arms. We have observed that when selecting a set of spiral galaxies based on a threshold on spirality, the pitch angle of spiral arms appear increase with redshift. We hypothesize that this is a selection effect: tightly-wound spiral arms become less visible as images degrade with increasing redshift, leading to fewer such galaxies being included in the sample at higher redshifts. We corroborate this hypothesis by artificially degrading images of nearby galaxies, then using a machine learning algorithm trained on Galaxy Zoo data to provide a spirality for each artificially degraded image. It correctly predicts that spirality decreases as image quality degrades. Thus, the mean pitch angle of those galaxies remaining above the spirality threshold is higher than those eliminated by the selection effect. This demonstrates that users who select samples of galaxies using a threshold of Galaxy Zoo votes must carefully consider the possibility of selection effects on morphological measures, even if the measure itself is believed to be objective and unbiased. Finally, we also perform an empirical sensitivity analysis to demonstrate that SpArcFiRe's output changes in a smooth and predictable fashion to changes in its internal algorithmic parameters.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.