Paper detail

Spaces of commuting elements in the classical groups

Let $G$ be the classical group, and let Hom$(\mathbb{Z}^m,G)$ denote the space of commuting $m$-tuples in $G$. First, we refine the formula for the Poincaré series of Hom$(\mathbb{Z}^m,G)$ due to Ramras and Stafa by assigning (signed) integer partitions to (signed) permutations. Using the refined formula, we determine the top term of the Poincaré series, and apply it to prove the dependence of the topology of Hom$(\mathbb{Z}^m,G)$ on the parity of $m$ and the rational hyperbolicity of Hom$(\mathbb{Z}^m,G)$ for $m\ge 2$. Next, we give a minimal generating set of the cohomology of Hom$(\mathbb{Z}^m,G)$ and determine the cohomology in low dimensions. We apply these results to prove homological stability for Hom$(\mathbb{Z}^m,G)$ with the best possible stable range. Baird proved that the cohomology of Hom$(\mathbb{Z}^m,G)$ is identified with a certain ring of invariants of the Weyl group of $G$, and our approach is a direct calculation of this ring of invariants.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.