Paper detail

SpaceML: Distributed Open-source Research with Citizen Scientists for the Advancement of Space Technology for NASA

Traditionally, academic labs conduct open-ended research with the primary focus on discoveries with long-term value, rather than direct products that can be deployed in the real world. On the other hand, research in the industry is driven by its expected commercial return on investment, and hence focuses on a real world product with short-term timelines. In both cases, opportunity is selective, often available to researchers with advanced educational backgrounds. Research often happens behind closed doors and may be kept confidential until either its publication or product release, exacerbating the problem of AI reproducibility and slowing down future research by others in the field. As many research organizations tend to exclusively focus on specific areas, opportunities for interdisciplinary research reduce. Undertaking long-term bold research in unexplored fields with non-commercial yet great public value is hard due to factors including the high upfront risk, budgetary constraints, and a lack of availability of data and experts in niche fields. Only a few companies or well-funded research labs can afford to do such long-term research. With research organizations focused on an exploding array of fields and resources spread thin, opportunities for the maturation of interdisciplinary research reduce. Apart from these exigencies, there is also a need to engage citizen scientists through open-source contributors to play an active part in the research dialogue. We present a short case study of SpaceML, an extension of the Frontier Development Lab, an AI accelerator for NASA. SpaceML distributes open-source research and invites volunteer citizen scientists to partake in development and deployment of high social value products at the intersection of space and AI.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.