Paper detail

Space-Time Foam and Cosmic-Ray Interactions

It has been proposed that propagation of cosmic rays at extreme-energy may be sensitive to Lorentz-violating metric fluctuations (``foam''). We investigate the changes in interaction thresholds for cosmic-rays and gamma-rays interacting on the CMB and IR backgrounds, for a class of stochastic models of spacetime foam. The strength of the foam is characterized by the factor (E/M_P)^a, where ``a'' is a phenomenological suppression parameter. We find that there exists a critical value of ``a'' (dependent on the particular reaction), below which the threshold energy can only be lowered, and above which the threshold energy may be raised, but at most by a factor of two. Thus, it does not appear possible in this class of models to extend cosmic-ray spectra significantly beyond their classical absorption energies. However, the lower thresholds resulting from foam may have signatures in the cosmic-ray spectrum. We also find that cosmic-ray energies cannot exceed the fundamental Planck scale, and so set a lower bound of 10^8 TeV on the context of this model for the scale of gravity. Finally, we comment in the apparent non-conservation of particle energy-momentum, and speculate on its re-emergence as dark energy in the foamy vacuum.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.