Paper detail

Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. IX. Velocity-Delay Maps for Broad Emission Lines in NGC 5548

We report velocity-delay maps for prominent broad emission lines, Ly_alpha, CIV, HeII and H_beta, in the spectrum of NGC5548. The emission-line responses inhabit the interior of a virial envelope. The velocity-delay maps reveal stratified ionization structure. The HeII response inside 5-10 light-days has a broad single-peaked velocity profile. The Ly_alpha, CIV, and H_beta responses peak inside 10 light-days, extend outside 20 light-days, and exhibit a velocity profile with two peaks separated by 5000 km/s in the 10 to 20 light-day delay range. The velocity-delay maps show that the M-shaped lag vs velocity structure found in previous cross-correlation analysis is the signature of a Keplerian disk with a well-defined outer edge at R=20 light-days. The outer wings of the M arise from the virial envelope, and the U-shaped interior of the M is the lower half of an ellipse in the velocity-delay plane. The far-side response is weaker than that from the near side, so that we see clearly the lower half, but only faintly the upper half, of the velocity--delay ellipse. The delay tau=(R/c)(1-sin(i))=5 light-days at line center is from the near edge of the inclined ring, giving the inclination i=45 deg. A black hole mass of M=7x10^7 Msun is consistent with the velocity-delay structure. A barber-pole pattern with stripes moving from red to blue across the CIV and possibly Ly_alpha line profiles suggests the presence of azimuthal structure rotating around the far side of the broad-line region and may be the signature of precession or orbital motion of structures in the inner disk. Further HST observations of NGC 5548 over a multi-year timespan but with a cadence of perhaps 10 days rather than 1 day could help to clarify the nature of this new AGN phenomenon.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
Keith HorneG. De RosaB. M. PetersonA. J. BarthJ. ElyM. M. FausnaughG. A. KrissL. PeiS. M. AdamsM. D. AndersonP. ArevaloT G. BeattyV. N. BennertM. C. BentzA. BigleyS. BisogniG. A. BormanT. A. BorosonM. C. BottorffW. N. BrandtA. A. BreeveldM. BrothertonJ. E. BrownJ. S. BrownE. M. CackettG. CanalizoM. T. CariniK. I. ClubbJ. M. ComerfordE. M. CorsiniD. M. CrenshawS. CroftK. V. CroxallE. Dalla BontaA. J. DeasonM. DehghanianA. De Lorenzo-CaceresK. D. DenneyM. DietrichC. DoneR. EdelsonN. V. EfimovaM. EracleousP. A. EvansG. J. FerlandA. V. FilippenkoK. FlatlandO. D. FoxE. GardnerE. L. GatesN. GehrelsS. GeierJ. M. GelbordM. R. GoadL. GonzalezV. GorjianJ. E. GreeneC. J. GrierD. GrupeA. GuptaP. B. HallC. B. HendersonS. HicksE. HolmbeckT. W. -S. HoloienT. HutchisonM. ImJ. J. JensenC. A. JohnsonM. D. JonerJ. JonesJ. KaastraS. KaspiP. L. KellyJ. A. KenneaM. KimS. KimS. C. KimA. KingS. A. KlimanovC. S. KochanekK. T. KoristaY. KrongoldM. W. LauJ. C. LeeD. C. LeonardMiao LiP. LiraC. LochhaasZhiyuan MaF. MacInnisM. A. MalkanE. R. Manne-NicholasS. MathurJ. C. MauerhanR. McGurkI. M. Mc HardyC. MontuoriL. MorelliA. MosqueraD. MuddF. Mueller-SanchezS. V. NazarovH. NetzerR. P. NorrisJ. A. NousekM. L. NguyenP. OchnerD. N. OkhmatA. PancoastI. PapadakisJ. R. ParksM. T. PennyA. PizzellaR. W. PoggeR. PoleskiJ. -U. PottD. ProgaS. E. RafterH. -W. RixJ. RunnoeD. A. SaylorJ. S. SchimoiaK. SchnuelleB. ScottS. G. SergeevB. J. ShappeeI. ShivversM. SiegelG. V. SimonianA. SivieroA. SkielboeG. SomersM. SpencerD. StarkeyD. J. StevensM. A. StraussH. -I. SungJ. TayarK. G. TeemsN. TejosT. TreuC. S. TurnerP. UttleyJ . Van SadersM. VestergaardL. VicanS. Villanueva JrC. VillforthY. WeissJ. -H. WooH. YanS. YoungH. YukN. L. ZakamskaW. ZhengW. ZhuY. Zu
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Keith HorneG. De RosaB. M. PetersonA. J. BarthJ. ElyM. M. FausnaughG. A. KrissL. PeiS. M. AdamsM. D. AndersonP. ArevaloT G. BeattyV. N. BennertM. C. BentzA. BigleyS. BisogniG. A. BormanT. A. BorosonM. C. BottorffW. N. BrandtA. A. BreeveldM. BrothertonJ. E. BrownJ. S. BrownE. M. CackettG. CanalizoM. T. CariniK. I. ClubbJ. M. ComerfordE. M. CorsiniD. M. CrenshawS. CroftK. V. CroxallE. Dalla BontaA. J. DeasonM. DehghanianA. De Lorenzo-CaceresK. D. DenneyM. DietrichC. DoneR. EdelsonN. V. EfimovaM. EracleousP. A. EvansG. J. FerlandA. V. FilippenkoK. FlatlandO. D. FoxE. GardnerE. L. GatesN. GehrelsS. GeierJ. M. GelbordM. R. GoadL. GonzalezV. GorjianJ. E. GreeneC. J. GrierD. GrupeA. GuptaP. B. HallC. B. HendersonS. HicksE. HolmbeckT. W. -S. HoloienT. HutchisonM. ImJ. J. JensenC. A. JohnsonM. D. JonerJ. JonesJ. KaastraS. KaspiP. L. KellyJ. A. KenneaM. KimS. KimS. C. KimA. KingS. A. KlimanovC. S. KochanekK. T. KoristaY. KrongoldM. W. LauJ. C. LeeD. C. LeonardMiao LiP. LiraC. LochhaasZhiyuan MaF. MacInnisM. A. MalkanE. R. Manne-NicholasS. MathurJ. C. MauerhanR. McGurkI. M. Mc HardyC. MontuoriL. MorelliA. MosqueraD. MuddF. Mueller-SanchezS. V. NazarovH. NetzerR. P. NorrisJ. A. NousekM. L. NguyenP. OchnerD. N. OkhmatA. PancoastI. PapadakisJ. R. ParksM. T. PennyA. PizzellaR. W. PoggeR. PoleskiJ. -U. PottD. ProgaS. E. RafterH. -W. RixJ. RunnoeD. A. SaylorJ. S. SchimoiaK. SchnuelleB. ScottS. G. SergeevB. J. ShappeeI. ShivversM. SiegelG. V. SimonianA. SivieroA. SkielboeG. SomersM. SpencerD. StarkeyD. J. StevensM. A. StraussH. -I. SungJ. TayarK. G. TeemsN. TejosT. TreuC. S. TurnerP. UttleyJ . Van SadersM. VestergaardL. VicanS. Villanueva JrC. VillforthY. WeissJ. -H. WooH. YanS. YoungH. YukN. L. ZakamskaW. ZhengW. ZhuY. Zu

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.