Paper detail

Source-count Distribution of Gamma-Ray Blazars

With ten years of operation and an exceptional dataset, the Fermi-Large Area Telescope allows us to unveil the detailed composition of the extragalactic $γ$-ray sky above $\rm 100\,MeV$. In this paper, we derive the intrinsic source-count distribution (logN-logS) of extragalactic sources (i.e., blazars) at $|b|>20^{\circ}$ via the efficiency correction method. With this approach, we are able to measure the distribution down to a photon flux of $\sim10^{-10}$${\rm \, ph \,\, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}}$ and to an energy flux of $\sim10^{-12}$${\rm \, erg \,\, cm^{-2} \, s^{-1}}$. In both cases the logN-logS becomes flatter at low fluxes. Moreover, we show that this logN-logS is representative of the blazar population (assuming the majority of unassociated sources are blazars) and allows us to constrain its evolution quite effectively. Among recently proposed evolutionary models, we find that the Pure Density Evolution (PDE) model best describes the evolutionary properties of the blazar population and that their integrated emission accounts for $\sim 50^{+10}_{-5}\%$ of the total extragalactic \gm-ray background.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.