Paper detail

Sound Speed and Viscosity of Semi-Relativistic Relic Neutrinos

Generalized fluid equations, using sound speed $c_{\rm eff}^2$ and viscosity $c_{\rm vis}^2$ as effective parameters, provide a convenient phenomenological formalism for testing the relic neutrino "null hypothesis," i.e. that that neutrinos are relativistic and free-streaming prior to recombination. In this work, we relax the relativistic assumption and ask "to what extent can the generalized fluid equations accommodate finite neutrino mass?" We consider both the mass of active neutrinos, which are largely still relativistic at recombination $m^2 / T^2 \sim 0.2$, and the effect of a semi-relativistic sterile component. While there is no one-to-one mapping between mass/mixing parameters and $c_{\rm eff}^2$ and $c_{\rm vis}^2$, we demonstrate that the existence of a neutrino mass could induce a bias to measurements of $c_{\rm eff}^2$ and $c_{\rm vis}^2$ at the level of $0.01 m^2 / T^2 \sim 10^{-3}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.