Paper detail

Some universal relations between the gap and thermodynamic functions plausible for various models of superconductors

It is proven that there exist some universal relations between the energy gap and the differences of the thermodynamic potential, entropy, specific heat and critical magnetic field for many two- and three-dimensional models of superconductivity with spin-singlet Cooper pairs forming \textit{s} or \textit{d} or \textit{g} etc. states. The obtained formulae make it possible to derive thermodynamic functions and, in particular, the superconducting specific heat and the critical magnetic induction in the whole temperature range $0\leq T\leq T_{c}$ employing the form of $Δ(T)$ only. The inverse formula allowing us to find $Δ(T)$, when the temperature dependence of the specific heat difference is known, is also presented. The results are referred to some obtained within the McMillan formalism, and some remarks on an application of the present formulae to the {\textit{t--J}} model are given.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.