Paper detail

Some Stylometric Remarks on Ovid's Heroides and the Epistula Sapphus

This article aims to contribute to two well-worn areas of debate in classical Latin philology, relating to Ovid's Heroides. The first is the question of the authenticity (and, to a lesser extent the correct position) of the letter placed fifteenth by almost every editor -- the so-called Epistula Sapphus (henceforth ES). The secondary question, although perhaps now less fervently debated, is the authenticity of the 'Double Heroides', placed by those who accept them as letters 16-21. I employ a variety of methods drawn from the domain of computational stylometry to consider the poetics and the lexico-grammatical features of these elegiac poems in the broader context of a corpus of 'shorter' (from 20 to 546 lines) elegiac works from five authors (266 poems in all) comprising more or less all of the non-fragmentary classical corpus. Based on a variety of techniques, every measure gives clear indication that the poetic style of the Heroides is Ovidian, but distinctive; they can be accurately isolated from Ovid more broadly. The Single and Double Heroides split into two clear groups, with the ES grouped consistently with the single letters. Furthermore, by comparing the style of the letters with the 'early' (although there are complications in this label) works of the Amores and the late works of the Ex Ponto, the evidence supports sequential composition -- meaning that the ES is correctly placed -- and, further, supports the growing consensus that the double letters were composed significantly later, in exile.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.