Paper detail

Some spectral properties of the quasar ultraviolet bump

In the present work the part of the quasar UV-optical bump within the wavelength range 1210-1450Å was studied with the help of composite spectra compiled from the samples of SDSS DR7 spectra with the similar spectral index α_λ within 1270-1480 Å. This division allowed to see weak emission lines, which were not detected in previous studies of the quasar composite spectra, but were known from individual optical or composite UV spectra from the Hubble Space Telescope. Although the physical explanation of the difference in spectral indices between quasars and their dependence on quasar parameters is still not clear, it is obvious that this difference has to be taken into account when generating composite spectra, e.g. for redshift measurements. It was also shown that the equivalent width of the emission lines does not depend on the spectral index.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.