Paper detail

Some remarks on the $n$-linear Hilbert transform for $n\geq 4$

We prove that for every integer $n\geq 4$, the $n$-linear operator whose symbol is given by a product of two generic symbols of $n$-linear Hilbert transform type, does not satisfy any $L^p$ estimates similar to those in Hölder inequality. Then, we extend this result to multi-linear operators whose symbols are given by a product of an arbitrary number of generic symbols of $n$-linear Hilbert transform kind. As a consequence, under the same assumption $n\geq 4$,these immediately imply that for any $1< p_1, ..., p_n \leq \infty$ and $0<p<\infty$ with $1/p_1 + ... + 1/p_n = 1/p$, there exist non-degenerate subspaces $Γ\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ of maximal dimension $n-1$, and Mikhlin symbols $m$ singular along $Γ$, for which the associated $n$-linear multiplier operators $T_m$ do not map $L^{p_1}\times ... \times L^{p_n}$ into $L^p$. These counterexamples are in sharp contrast with the bi-linear case, where similar operators are known to satisfy many such $L^p$ estimates.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.