Paper detail

Some remarks about the derivative operator and generalized Stirling numbers

Studying expressions of the form $(f(x)D)^p$, where $D={\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx}}$ is the derivative operator, goes back to Scherk&#39;s Ph.D. thesis in 1823. We show that this can be extended as ${\displaystyle\sum γ_{p;a} (f^{(0)})^{a(0)+1} (f^{(1)})^{a(1)}...(f^{(p-1)})^{a(p-1)}D^{p-\sum_i i a(i)}}$}, where the summation is taken over the $p$-tuples $(a_0, a_1,..., a_{p-1})$, satisfying $\sum_{i}a(i)=p-1,\, \sum_{i}i a(i)<p$, $f^{(i)}=D^i f$ and $γ_{p;a}$ is the number of increasing trees on the vertex set $[0, p]$ having $a(0)+1$ leaves and having $a(i)$ vertices with $i$ children for $0<i<p$. Thus, previously known results about increasing trees, lead us to some equalities containing coefficients $γ_{p;a}$. In the sequel, we consider the expansion of $(x^k D)^p$ and coefficients appearing there, which are called generalized Stirling numbers by physicists. Some results about these coefficients and their inverses are discussed through bijective methods. Particularly, we introduce and use the notion of $(p, k)$-forest in these arguments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.