Paper detail

Some properties are not even partially testable

For a property $P$ and a sub-property $P'$, we say that $P$ is $P'$-partially testable with $q$ queries if there exists an algorithm that distinguishes, with high probability, inputs in $P'$ from inputs $ε$-far from $P$ by using $q$ queries. There are natural properties that require many queries to test, but can be partitioned into a small number of subsets for which they are partially testable with very few queries. We prove the existence of a property $P$ such that the only subsets $P'$ for which $P$ is $P'$-partially testable are very small. To prove this we introduce new techniques for proving property testing lower bounds. In addition to obtaining some broad-brush criteria for non-testability, this implies a lower bound on the possibility of PCPPs with a sublinear proof. This also implies lower bounds on MAPs, a notion newly defined by Gur and Rothblum. The new techniques rely on analyzing a proposed partial tester. We show that the queries performed by a tester must, with high probability, query indexes where a uniformly random member of the sub-property has low entropy. We then show how one can aggregate the "entropy loss" to deduce that a random choice in the sub-property must have low entropy, and therefore the sub-property must be small. We develop two techniques for aggregating the entropy loss. A simpler technique that applies to non-adaptive testers is based on partitioning the input bits into high query probability parts and parts where there is an entropy loss when conditioned on the high probability parts. Against adaptive testers we develop a technique based on constructing a decision tree. The root-to-leaf paths in this tree rearrange the input into parts where each exhibits entropy loss when conditioned on the path prefix. This decision tree is constructed by combining carefully selected decision trees from those used by the adaptive testing algorithm.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.