Some Languages Recognized by Two-Way Finite Automata with Quantum and Classical States

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

{\it Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states} (2QCFA) were introduced by Ambainis and Watrous, and it was shown that 2QCFA have superiority over {\it two-way probabilistic finite automata} (2PFA) for recognizing some non-regular languages such as the language Leq={anbn∣n∈N}L_{eq}=\{a^{n}b^{n}\mid n\in \mathbf{N}\} and the palindrome language Lpal={ω∈{a,b}∗∣ω=ωR}L_{pal}=\{ω\in \{a,b\}^*\midω=ω^R\}, where xRx^R is xx in the reverse order. It is interesting to find more languages like these that witness the superiority of 2QCFA over 2PFA. In this paper, we consider the language Lm={xcy∣Σ={a,b,c},x,y∈{a,b}∗,c∈Σ,∣x∣=∣y∣}L_{m}=\{xcy\mid Σ=\{a, b, c\}, x,y\in\{a,b\}^{*},c\inΣ, |x|=|y|\} that is similar to the middle language Lmiddle={xay∣x,y∈Σ∗,a∈Σ,∣x∣=∣y∣}L_{middle}=\{xay\mid x,y\inΣ^{*},a\inΣ, |x|=|y|\}. We prove that the language LmL_{m} can be recognized by 2QCFA with one-sided error in polynomial expected time. Also, we show that LmL_{m} can be recognized by 2PFA with bounded error, but only in exponential expected time. Thus LmL_{m} is another witness of the fact that 2QCFA are more powerful than their classical counterparts.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.