Paper detail

Some geometric inequalities related to Liouville equation

In this paper, we prove that if $u$ is a solution to the Liouville equation \begin{align} \label{scalliouville} Δu+e^{2u} =0 \quad \mbox{in $\mathbb{R}^2$,} \end{align}then the diameter of $\mathbb{R}^2$ under the conformal metric $g=e^{2u}δ$ is bounded below by $π$. Here $δ$ is the Euclidean metric in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Moreover, we explicitly construct a family of solutions such that the corresponding diameters of $\mathbb{R}^2$ range over $[π,2π)$. We also discuss supersolutions. We show that if $u$ is a supersolution and $\int_{\mathbb{R}^2} e^{2u} dx<\infty$, then the diameter of $\mathbb{R}^2$ under the metric $e^{2u}δ$ is less than or equal to $2π$. For radial supersolutions, we use both analytical and geometric approaches to prove some inequalities involving conformal lengths and areas of disks in $\mathbb{R}^2$. We also discuss the connection of the above results with the sphere covering inequality in the case of Gaussian curvature bounded below by $1$. Higher dimensional generalizations are also discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.