Paper detail

Some Error Analysis for the Quantum Phase Estimation Algorithms

This paper is concerned with the phase estimation algorithm in quantum computing algorithms, especially the scenarios where (1) the input vector is not an eigenvector; (2) the unitary operator is not exactly implemented; (3) random approximations are used for the unitary operator, e.g., the QDRIFT method. We characterize the probability of computing the phase values in terms of the consistency error, including the residual error, Trotter splitting error, or statistical mean-square error. In the first two cases, we show that in order to obtain the phase value with {error less or equal to $2^{-n}$ } and probability at least $1-ε$, the required number of qubits is $ t \geq n + \log \big(2 + \frac{δ^2 }{2 εΔ\!E^2 } \big).$ The parameter $δ$ quantifies the error associated with the inexact eigenvector and/or the unitary operator, and $Δ\! E$ characterizes the spectral gap, i.e., the separation from the rest of the phase values. For the third case, we found a similar estimate, but the number of random steps has to be sufficiently large.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.