Paper detail

Some considerations on crowd Congestion Level

The concept of (crowd) Congestion Level ($CL$) was introduced in Feliciani et al (Transportation Research, 2018) and presented at the PED 2018 conference by C. Feliciani. Following the PED presentation, along with appreciation for the novel contribution, a few interesting questions were raised, concerning the integral/differential nature of the definition of $CL$, and the possibility of defining a related pure number. In these short notes we are going, although with no attempt at rigour or formality, to present some considerations suggesting that the two problems are related, and providing a possible solution. Furthermore, using both theoretical arguments and analysis of simulated data in complex scenarios, we will try to shed further light on the meaning and applications of this concept. Finally, we analyse some results of an experiment performed with human participants in a ``crossing-flows'' scenario.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.