Paper detail

Solving S-unit, Mordell, Thue, Thue-Mahler and generalized Ramanujan-Nagell equations via Shimura-Taniyama conjecture

In the first part we construct algorithms which we apply to solve S-unit, Mordell, cubic Thue, cubic Thue-Mahler and generalized Ramanujan-Nagell equations. As a byproduct we obtain alternative practical approaches for various classical Diophantine problems, including the fundamental problem of finding all elliptic curves over Q with good reduction outside a given finite set of rational primes. To illustrate the utility of our algorithms we determined the solutions of large classes of equations, containing many examples of interest which are out of reach for the known methods. In addition we used the resulting data to motivate various conjectures and questions, including Baker's explicit abc-conjecture and a new conjecture on S-integral points of any hyperbolic genus one curve over Q. In the second part we establish new results for certain old Diophantine problems (e.g. the difference of squares and cubes) related to Mordell equations, and we prove explicit height bounds for cubic Thue, cubic Thue--Mahler and generalized Ramanujan--Nagell equations. As a byproduct, we obtain here an alternative proof of classical theorems of Baker, Coates and Vinogradov-Sprindzuk. In fact we get refined versions of their theorems, which improve the actual best results in many fundamental cases. Our results and algorithms all ultimately rely on the method of Faltings (Arakelov, Parshin, Szpiro) combined with the Shimura-Taniyama conjecture, and they all do not use lower bounds for linear forms in (elliptic) logarithms. In the third part we solve the problem of constructing an efficient sieve for the S-integral points of bounded height on any elliptic curve E over Q with given Mordell-Weil basis of E(Q).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.