Paper detail

Solving linear-rate ODE hierarchies (like master equations) using closures and operator splitting

Countably infinite systems of linear ODEs arise as forward equations for many continuous-time Markov processes. The standard recipe -- truncate to a finite cap N and exponentiate -- pays cubic cost in N and a time-growing boundary-feedback bias. We identify a structural condition on the rates, L_{n+r,n} = alpha_r n + beta_r ("linear-rate"), under which the generating function G(z,t) = sum_n x_n(t) z^n satisfies a first-order linear PDE in z, and the method of characteristics yields a composition-multiplier representation G(z,t) = K_t(z) G(Phi_t(z), 0). The Taylor coefficients of Phi_t and K_t on any output window {0,...,N} are determined exactly by a closed lower-triangular polynomial ODE on R^{2(N+1)}, independent of any coefficients above N. Truncation enters only through the support M_0 of the initial law, set independently of N. For binary birth-death the closure collapses to the geometric tail p_n(t) = p_1(t) rho(t)^{n-1} with rho(t) = lambda(1 - e^{-(mu-lambda)t})/(mu - lambda e^{-(mu-lambda)t}). The linear-rate class spans Markov branching with immigration, multi-type branching, matrix-valued telegraph and G/R elongation, and signed or non-stochastic hierarchies. When the generator decomposes as L = A + B with A linear-rate and B non-affine (Schlogl bistable, predator-prey, lattice reaction-diffusion), we pair the closure with Strang splitting on B; Richardson extrapolation lifts the time order to Delta-t^4 at ~3x wall clock. On the Schlogl problem at V=500, N=8,000, the split runs 6.3x faster than dense Pade and 20x faster than sparse Krylov expv. For the stationary regime, a closure-Strang power iteration extends the same machinery to multi-dimensional product-state-space generators where sparse LU hits OOM/OOT or boundary-projection bias at usable caps. Numerical experiments locate where each route wins and where it is dominated by standard tools.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.