Paper detail

Solving Laplacian Systems in Logarithmic Space

We investigate the space complexity of solving linear systems of equations. While all known deterministic or randomized algorithms solving a square system of $n$ linear equations in $n$ variables require $Ω(\log^2 n)$ space, Ta-Shma (STOC 2013) recently showed that on a quantum computer an approximate solution can be computed in logarithmic space, giving the first explicit computational task for which quantum computation seems to outperform classical computation with respect to space complexity. In this paper we show that for systems of linear equations in the Laplacian matrix of graphs, the same logarithmic space complexity can actually be achieved by a classical (i.e., non-quantum) algorithm. More precisely, given a system of linear equations $Lx=b$, where $L$ is the (normalized) Laplacian matrix of a graph on $n$ vertices and $b$ is a unit-norm vector, our algorithm outputs a vector $\tilde x$ such that $\left\lVert\tilde x -x\right\rVert\le 1/\mathrm{poly}(n)$ and uses only $O(\log n)$ space if the underlying graph has polynomially bounded weights. We also show how to estimate, again in logarithmic space, the smallest non-zero eigenvalue of $L$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.