Paper detail

Solving graph equipartition SDPs on an algebraic variety

Semidefinite programs are generally challenging to solve due to their high dimensionality. Burer and Monteiro developed a non-convex approach to solve linear SDP problems by applying its low rank property. Their approach is fast because they used factorization to reduce the problem size. In this paper, we focus on solving the SDP relaxation of a graph equipartition problem, which involves an additional semidefinite upper bound constraint over the traditional linear SDP. By applying the factorization approach, we get a non-convex problem with an additional non-smooth spectral inequality constraint. We discuss when the non-convex problem is equivalent to the original SDP, and when a second order stationary point of the non-convex problem is also a global minimum. Our results generalize previous works on smooth non-convex factorization approaches for linear SDP to the non-smooth case. Moreover, the constraints of the non-convex problem involve an algebraic variety with some conducive properties that allow us to use Riemannian optimization techniques and non-convex augmented Lagrangian method to solve the SDP problem very efficiently with certified global optimality.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.