Paper detail

Solutions to the relativistic precession model

The relativistic precession model (RPM) can be used to obtain a precise measurement of the mass and spin of a black hole when the appropriate set of quasi periodic oscillations is detected in the power-density spectrum of an accreting black hole. However, in previous studies the solution of the RPM equations could be obtained only through numerical methods at a price of an intensive computational effort. Here we demonstrate that the RPM system of equations can be solved analytically, drastically reducing the computational load, now limited to the Monte-Carlo simulation necessary to estimate the uncertainties. The analytical method not only provides an easy solution to the RPM system when three oscillations are detected, but in all the cases where the detection of two simultaneous oscillations is coupled with an independent mass measurement. We also present a computationally inexpensive method to place limits on the black hole mass and spin when only two oscillations are observed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.