Paper detail

Solar Neutrinos: Hint for Neutrino Mass

The present status of the solar neutrino problem is reviewed. The strongest motivation for new neutrino physics comes from the complete phenomenological failure of astrophysical solutions: (1) The standard solar model is excluded by each of the solar neutrino experiments. (2) The combined results of Homestake and Kamiokande are incompatible with any astrophysical solution. (3) Even if the Homestake results were ignored entirely, there is no realistic solar model so far that describes the Kamiokande and gallium data simultaneously within their experimental uncertainties. On the other hand, the MSW solutions provide a complete description of the data, strongly hinting at the existence of mass and mixing of neutrinos. The MSW predictions for the future experiments are given in detail. It is stressed that solar model uncertainties are significant in determining the oscillation parameters and in making predictions for the future experiments. Especially, a $^8$B flux (or $S_{17}$) smaller by 20\% than that of the Bahcall-Pinsonneault model can make the interpretation of the charged to neutral current ratio measurement in SNO ambiguous.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.