Paper detail

Soft X-ray properties of a complete sample of radio sources

We present the soft X-ray (0.1--2.4 keV) properties of a complete sample of 88 southern radio sources derived from the Wall \& Peacock 2-Jy sample. It comprises 68 radio galaxies, 18 quasars and 2 BL Lac objects. Whereas both BL Lac objects and all but one quasar are detected in the {\it ROSAT} All-Sky Survey, the fraction of detected radio galaxies is only $\sim$ 60 per cent. For the undetected sources upper limits to the X-ray flux are given. We confirm the correlation of the soft X-ray luminosity (\lx) with the core radio luminosity (\lc) for galaxies as well as for quasars using partial correlation analysis, whereas the corresponding correlations between \lx and \lt are probably spurious due to sample selection effects. We also find strong correlations between \lx and \lc for both Fanaroff-Riley type I (FR~I) and type II galaxies. The broad-line radio galaxies (BLRGs) and the quasars are at the top end of the X-ray luminosity distribution and the detection rate of these objects generally is higher than that of the narrow- or weak-lined radio galaxies. This indicates the presence of an anisotropic X-ray component in BLRGs and quasars, as predicted by unified schemes for radio sources.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.