Paper detail

Soft X-ray heating as a mechanism of optical continuum generation in solar-type star superflares

Superflares on the solar type stars observed by \textit{Kepler} demonstrate the contrast in the optical continuum of the order 0.1--1 per cent. The mechanism of formation of this radiation is not firmly established. We consider a model where the stellar atmosphere is irradiated by the soft X rays emitted from the flaring loop filled with the hot plasma. This radiation heats a large area beneath the loop. Subsequent cooling due to {\sc h$^{-}$} and hydrogen free-bound emission can contribute to the observed enhanced continuum. We solve the equations of radiative transfer, statistical equilibrium, ionization balance and radiative equilibrium in the model atmosphere illuminated by the soft X rays, compute the temperature and the electron density in the atmosphere and find the emergent radiation. We found that a flare loop of the length $\sim10^{10}$~cm and plasma density $10^{12}$~cm$^{-3}$ at the temperature $T = 20$ MK can provide the contrast in the \textit{Kepler} bandpass of 0.1 and 0.8 per cent if the heated region covers $\sim$~1 and 10 per cent of the visible stellar surface respectively. The required emission measure is of the order $10^{55}$~cm$^{-3}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.